top of page

From Actress to Author to Audiobook Narrator

evettems77
Sep 19
7 min read

I thought writing the book would be the hard part.


Then I sat in front of a microphone and met every character again, this time out loud.


There is something strange and wonderful about moving from actress to author, then turning around and becoming the voice of your own pages. As an actress, I was used to stepping into someone else’s words. As an author, I had finally written my own. As a narrator, I had to do both at the same time.


That sounds neat and tidy when I say it like that. It was not.


It was messy, funny, humbling, and, at times, a little emotional. I had written the scenes. I knew what the characters meant when they paused, snapped, lied, flirted, or tried not to cry. I knew where the jokes lived. I knew where the silence mattered.


But reading a narrative book with multiple characters and changing my voice just enough for the listener to know the difference was challenging.


Why I chose to narrate it myself


At first, I did think about hiring a professional narrator.


That would have been the sensible route. There are brilliant voice artists who do this every day. They know how to pace a chapter, how to protect their voices, how to keep character voices consistent, and how not to sound as though they need a cup of tea after twenty minutes.


I knew all that.


But I also knew these characters had been living in my head for a long time. I had heard them before anyone else did. I knew the rhythm of their speech, the words they leaned on, the little cracks in their confidence.


The actress in me whispered, “You can do this.”


The author in me whispered, “You might be the only one who knows exactly how it should sound.”


The practical part of me said, “It's expensive.”


That last voice was not wrong.


Producing an audiobook can be expensive. If you hire a narrator, there are talent fees. If you hire a studio, there are recording costs. Then comes editing, proofing, mastering, and all the technical steps that make the finished piece sound clean and professional.


Narrating it myself did not make it free. It only moved the cost around.


Instead of paying only in money, I paid in time, energy, preparation, and several moments of sitting alone thinking, “Why did I write such long sentences?”


Still, I wanted to try. Acting had taught me to trust the body, the breath, and the instinct. Writing had taught me to trust revision. Narration, I discovered, asks for both.


Meeting the characters again


I thought I knew my characters. Then I had to voice three of them in the same conversation.


On the page, it is easy enough to write:


She said.


He said.


They said.


Out loud, that becomes a juggling act.


One character is older and speaks slowly because they choose every word carefully. Another rushes in with opinions before checking whether anyone asked. Another hides behind humor. On paper, those differences can live in dialogue tags and word choice. In narration, they need to live in breath, pitch, placement, and pace.


I did not want cartoon voices. That was the fear.


There is a thin line between giving a character shape and turning them into a party trick. I had to remind myself that a voice does not need to be extreme to be distinct. Sometimes the smallest shift does the work.


A tighter jaw.


A softer ending to a sentence.


A little more air.


A little less patience.


One of the joys of acting is that you get to ask, “What does this person want?” Narrating my own work made me ask it again and again, even for characters who only appear for a few pages.


That surprised me. I assumed the lead characters would demand the most from me. In some ways they did. But the smaller characters needed care too. If someone walks into a scene, drops one line, and leaves, that line still has a job. It still belongs to a person.


There were days when switching voices felt like a dance. There were also days when it felt like changing hats in a windstorm.


I would finish a scene and realize I had given one character the wrong tone. Or I had drifted slightly in accent. Or I had made someone sound too harsh, when what I really wrote was fear dressed up as anger.


That is where narrating your own work becomes both a gift and a nuisance. You cannot pretend you do not know what the line means. You wrote it.


Dialects carry memory


Dialect is one of the things I care about most in storytelling.


The way a person speaks is never just sound. It carries where they are from, who raised them, what they are trying to hide, and sometimes who they wish they were.


I grew up listening to voices. I think most actors do. You hear music in the way people talk. The clipped sentence. The swallowed consonant. The word that belongs to one place and not another. The phrase that tells you someone has known a certain kind of kitchen, street, school, or grief.


When I wrote the book, I could hear those differences. When I narrated it, I had to decide how far to go.


That mattered.


Too little dialect, and something truthful disappears. Too much, and the story can start to feel performed rather than lived. I did not want the listener thinking about my accent work. I wanted them thinking about the scene.


So I tried to find the emotional reason for each voice. Dialect, at its best, is not decoration. It is character.


A person might soften their natural accent in a room where they feel judged. They might slide back into it when they are tired, angry, or nervous They might sound different with family than they do with strangers. That is real life, and it is delicious material for storytelling.


There were moments when I reread a line and thought, “No, that word does not sit in this mouth.” That is a strange sentence, but writers will understand it. Some words belong to some people. Others do not.


Recording made those mismatches obvious. The microphone is not very forgiving. It hears false notes.


The money part no one likes to talk about


Let’s talk about cost, because it affects creative choices more than people admit.


When you write a book, especially if you are publishing independently or managing parts of the process yourself, every decision has a price tag. Cover design. Formatting. Editing. Proof copies. Promotion. Then, if you want an audio version, the budget stretches again.


Recording at home can reduce some costs, but it brings its own problems. You need the right space. You need clean sound. You need to understand noise, echo, breath sounds, mouth clicks, room tone, and all the tiny gremlins that appear once you put headphones on.


A studio gives you support, but studio time costs money.


A professional editor can save your sanity, but editing hours add up.


Mastering is its own skill. The final files need to meet technical standards for distribution. That means volume levels, spacing, format, and consistency all matter. This is not just “read the book into a microphone and upload it.”


I learned quickly that doing the narration myself did not mean doing everything myself.


That was an important distinction.


I could bring the performance. I could prepare the text. I could make choices about character and tone. But I still needed ears I trusted. I still needed someone who could catch mistakes I was too close to hear.


There is a point where saving money can cost you the quality of the work. I had to be honest about that.


The goal was not to make the cheapest possible version. The goal was to make something I would not be embarrassed to share.


Editing is where patience goes to be tested


Recording feels like the big dramatic part. Editing is where the real endurance begins.


During recording, mistakes happen constantly. You stumble. Your stomach makes a noise. A truck goes by outside. You read the same sentence three times and somehow stress the wrong word each time. You turn a page too loudly. You discover that a sentence you proudly wrote is impossible to say in one breath.


There are also the sneaky mistakes.


A missing “the.”


A changed tense.


A name said slightly differently.


A line read beautifully, but not accurately.


That is why proof listening matters. Someone has to follow along with the text and catch what changed. Some changes are harmless. Others matter. If the meaning shifts, it has to be fixed.


The editing process is slow because every correction creates another step. You record pickups, which are corrected lines or sections. Then those pickups have to match the original recording as closely as possible. Same energy. Same distance from the microphone. Same character voice. Same emotional temperature.


That last one is harder than it sounds.


Imagine recording a scene where someone is furious, then two weeks later needing to replace one sentence in the middle of it. You cannot just read the sentence. You have to return to the moment.


That was when I felt most grateful for my acting background. Acting teaches you how to drop back into a scene. Not perfectly every time, but enough to find the thread again.


As for timeline, it is not quick. The recording may sound like the main event, but after that comes editing, proofing, pickups, mastering, quality checks, and submission. Each stage takes time, and each delay teaches you patience whether you asked for it or not.


I had imagined a clean path: record, edit, release.


The real path looked more like: record, listen, wince, fix, listen again, send notes, rerecord, wait, check files, find one more thing, fix that too, breathe.


Then, eventually, release.


The joy was still bigger than the fear


For all the work, there were moments I will not forget.


There was the first time I heard a scene outside my own head and thought, “Oh. There it is.”


There was the strange pleasure of laughing at a line I had written months earlier and almost forgotten.


There was the ache of voicing a tender scene and realizing I still felt protective of these people, even though I made them up.


That is the odd magic of it. By the time a book reaches readers, the author has usually lived with it for years. Draft after draft. Doubt after doubt. You think you are done with it.


Then narration asks you to come back, not as the person fixing commas, but as the person telling the story around a fire.


That felt old-fashioned in the best way.


It reminded me that stories began in the mouth before they lived on shelves. Someone spoke, someone listened, and something passed between them.


I do not know if every author should narrate their own work. Some absolutely should not, and I say that kindly. Writing and performing are different muscles. A great book deserves a great voice, whoever provides it.


But for me, it made sense. It joined two parts of my life I had kept in separate rooms.


The actress got to play.


The author got to listen.


And the narrator, new and nervous as she was, got to carry the story the rest of the way.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Exploring Themes in E.M.R.I.E.: A Sci-Fi Journey

Science fiction has always been a genre that pushes the boundaries of imagination, exploring the possibilities of technology, society, and the human condition. One such work that exemplifies this is E

 
 
 
Reader Feedback: Shaping the Future of E.M.R.I.E.

In an era where user experience dictates the success of any platform, the importance of reader feedback cannot be overstated. E.M.R.I.E., a platform dedicated to enhancing user engagement and satisfac

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page